Health Care Ethics USA
2006 - Vol. 14 No.2
Nurses: The Rodney Dangerfields of Health Care?
Ann Suziedelis, PhD
Executive Summary. Why do
nurses, so indispensable to healthcare, often express feelings of not being
respected or empowered to act in accord with their education and level of
service? This essay considers ways that organizational and clinical ethics
committees can work together to mediate discussions throughout a hospital to
address and remedy this situation.
Imagine a hospital without
nurses. It is like trying to conjure up a restaurant without food or a crowd
without people. Yet if they are so critically important, why do so many nurses
feel like Rodney Dangerfield - undervalued and sometimes disregarded? It would be foolish to suggest that all
nurses in all hospitals feel the same concerns, but there is a thread of deep
frustration across nursing that is relevant to both clinical and organizational
ethics. This is of particular concern to Catholic healthcare, since we have a
special recognition of our responsibility to honor the human dignity of all
persons - staff as well as patients. Employees who feel oppressed must be an
important focus of organizational ethics. Similarly, since patients benefit
when they are treated and cared for by a united and mutually respectful
healthcare team, discontented nurses are a matter of concern to clinical ethics
as well. The problem does not belong solely to ethics committees; their involvement
does not negate the legitimate interest and efforts of Human Resources,
Administration, and Security, among others, in addressing these matters.
Instead, while ethics brings its own interests, it can at the same time be the
driving force coordinating all these initiatives.
Some suggest that responsibility
for nurses' dissatisfaction falls solely on the shoulders of authoritarian
doctors. A recent poll of physicians at one hospital, however, suggests that
part of the problem may simply lie in the lack of honest, open, and mutually
respectful dialogue. The poll gives insight into how nebulous the place of
nurses in healthcare can be. The physician respondents rated the nursing staff
as one of the hospital's strongest assets, scoring nurses even higher than they
scored their fellow physicians. Yet in that same week, and in that same
hospital, a roomful of nurses agreed that they would never call for an ethics
consult because they feared the possibility of retribution from attendings.
Concerns vary from nurse to nurse and hospital to hospital, but that fear of
retribution (as well as a sense of being too easily dismissed, left out of
important conversations, and forced to endure whatever disrespect families and
patients choose to show them) is an important issue, not only for nurses, but
also for patients.
These concerns can be relevant to
both organizational and clinical ethics committees. In conversations where they
feel safe, nurses express one group of concerns that are in the purview of
clinical ethics. As medical professionals with the most extended hands-on
relationships with patients, nurses are sometimes frustrated about treatment
choices made for their patients, and resentful of being left out of
conversations about their care. For example, they sometimes express concern
that too much is being done after the time has arrived to allow death to come
peacefully. At other times, they worry that a family is "letting go too soon."
In either case, nurses feel that some surrogates are making inappropriate
decisions, and that physicians are buckling too quickly to their demands. An
organizational ethics issue related to this is that the physician may be giving
in to the surrogates because they are so confrontational that it is easier to
do what they want than to fight them. The nurse, however, if given no choice
but to take the ongoing verbal abuse, can wear down quickly. While insulting
the nursing care given their loved ones can be the way a relative vents
understandable frustration, fear, and grief, nurses should not be offered up as
sacrificial lambs, forced to absorb it all without recourse.
Another concern nurses have is
that some patients are not being told the truth about their prognoses, or are
not being given sufficient information to make informed decisions. Whether or
not the nurses are right that a particular patient's needs are not being
addressed correctly, their lack of a sense of empowerment can cause the
situation to become a source of brewing frustration. The existence of this kind
of situation is an opportunity for ethics committees to collaborate with others
to instill confidence in nurses about calling consults to help mediate
conversation.
In yet another area of
discontent, a nurse manager with significant responsibilities in her area
describes feeling invisible. Some doctors, she complains, look right past her
and her legitimate authority, to take their questions over her head to
Administration. The ghosts of olden days, when nurses rose and stood at
attention when a physician entered the nursing station, still linger.
Organizational and clinical
ethics can work together, and with others across the hospital, to address these
concerns. The overarching initiative must be to bring about constructive
conversation between doctors and nurses, with other efforts undergirding this
focus. The first of these would be to increase the comfort level of nurses
about calling an ethics consult. Toward this end, ethics committees can
facilitate conversations with the Chief Medical Officer and Administration to
develop a clearly understood and enforced policy to ensure that a physician
will face disciplinary action if he or she intimidates or seeks reprisal
against a nurse for exercising a legitimate professional obligation to
intervene for the well-being of a patient. Ethics committees can work with
Security to develop procedures to support nurses who feel physically endangered
by a patient or visitor, and policies can be developed and enforced for the
removal of a disruptive visitor from a patient's room, and possibly from the
hospital. In the spirit of subsidiarity, ethics committees can work with
administrators to make a commitment to politely demur from considering matters
that have skipped past a nurse manager or director, returning the matter to the
responsible nurse for consideration.
Once such policies are in place,
HR can help nurses develop skills to implement these new approaches. The result
of these efforts will be a new and more powerful nursing force, demanding and
commanding well-deserved respect within a hospital that now has policies and
procedures in place to ensure that they can do so effectively and safely. All
of these efforts will support the success of an improved nurse/physician
relationship, which in turn will bring about better patient care - the ultimate
mission of healthcare.
Ann Suziedelis, PhD
Vice President, Mission Services
St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Hospital
Pontiac, Michigan
Suggested Readings
Danis, Susanne, ARNP, MSN; Forman, Hariett, RN, EdD; Simek, Peter P. MD. "The Nurse-Physician Relationship: Can It Be Saved?" Nursing Spectrum, 2004, at http://www.nursingspectrum.com/CareerManagement/Articles/nursephysician.htm (accessed 10/1/2006).
Sowers, Dave, RN. "The Caring Instinct." Barnes Jewish Hospital Website, 2005, at http://www.barnesjewish.org/groups/default.asp?NavID=1117
Bartholomew, Kathleen. Speak Your Truth: Proven Strategies for Effective Nurse-Physician Communication. Marblehead. MA: HCPro-Opus Communications, 2005.
Return to Index